Monday, November 01, 2010

What's next?

Introducing..."sheep-vertising."


This makes me wonder, is advertising on your pets next? If Carl and Amy Martin already have their kids acting as ads then why not put a t-shirt on their dog? Or I'm sure there are plenty of horse pastures that can be seen from the road.

I can't wait to see what crazy ideas people come up with next to use people (and perhaps pets) as ads!

"California lawmakers consider license plates that flash ads"

I hadn't heard about this idea until my roommate alerted me to it. I don't see how this would be anymore distracting to drivers than billboards or cars wrapped with logos. However, I don't know if I'd want the McDonald's golden arches on my car. Here is an article from the Los Angeles Times:


Motorists are used to seeing digital billboards that flash ads. But is the California Legislature's flirtation with license plate ads a bad sign?
That’s what some motorists are saying as a state Assembly committee toys with the idea of issuing digital license plates would turn the backs of cars into miniature billboards.
Lawmakers are being asked to launch a feasibility study to determine if the advertising revenue from millions of electronic license plates would help close the state's $19-billion deficit. In addition to being a moneymaker, the high-tech plates also could be used to streamline automobile registration procedures and to quickly tell motorists about hazardous road conditions and Amber Alerts, officials suggest.
Critics warn, however, that the ads would distract drivers and add to a growing clutter of roadside digital billboards, freeway message boards and other intrusive signage. Some also fear that the computerized equipment that would control the advertising could be hacked and hijacked by vandals intent on posting rogue messages.
Backers of the advertising idea say the digital plates could be programmed to display the ads only after an auto has been stopped for four seconds. The car's license plate number would be visible in small type at the corner of the plate when ads are being displayed, they say. The ads would disappear and the plate  numbers would be shown when the car was moving.
"It does offer some interesting possibilities," said state Sen. Curren Price (D-Inglewood), who introduced Senate Bill 1453, which calls for the study. The measure was passed in late May by a unanimous Senate vote and is scheduled to be taken up by the Assembly’s Transportation Committee on Tuesday.
Price said he proposed the study after learning of newly emerging technology that can create digital license plates. The review will be conducted by the Department of Motor Vehicles, with the help of other agencies such as the California Highway Patrol. So far, he has heard from several companies that are developing the digital devices, Price said.
One such firm is San Francisco-based Smart Plate Corp., described as a three-person start-up headquartered in a house in a hilly residential neighborhood. Company officials could not be reached for comment, although one of its principals has described the digital plates as similar to personalized license plates that the state sells as a revenue-generator.
In addition to commercial advertising, the plates could also be used for personal statements, such as support for sports teams or colleges, according to company Chief Executive M. Conrad Jordan. Some motorists say there are plenty of questions for the proposed feasibility study to answer. Tech blogs have lit up in recent days with dire warnings from commentators ridiculing the idea.
The plates "will have to be wireless, which will entail a statewide wireless network" that is open to hacking, wrote one. "Imagine all the license plates at once displaying porn or something."
Another person warned that the technology could end up registering the number of miles motorists drive, clearing the way for state officials "to tax you based on when and where you drive." Others have suggested a rear-end collision could wipe out a car's license plate number and expressed alarm that a digital plate on a parked car might drain the vehicle's battery.
One person warned that the technology could be used to flash the word "violation" to police the moment the car's registration expires.
Price said officials will address those issues and create safeguards to protect the digital plates' "integrity" before authorizing the issuance of any new plates. Guidelines for advertising content, the feasibility of do-it-yourself messaging and the possibility of sharing ad revenue with automobile owners will also be studied.
-- Bob Pool
Photo: Techi

Today on Yahoo.com - The Human Billboard Family

Meet the Martins, better known as The Billboard Family. A typical family that does something different. They hail from Missouri and also consider themselves to be “professional t-shirt wearers.”




Their idea came about after hearing of Jason Sadler and his company, “I Wear Your Shirt.” (Blog post # 8)

So what do you think of Carl and Amy Martin having their kids wear shirts as well…weird or brilliant? My vote goes to brilliant. They made something out of nothing and now their job is something most would consider...not really a job. They even say the kids have fun doing it!

A human billboard family would definitely catch my attention in the grocery store or on vacation. What about you?


Why pay when you can get it for free?

It's interesting that while some people are charging $5000 to get a company logo tattooed on them others are doing it for free. Two companies that automatically came to my mind were Apple and Harley-Davidson. The passion of the Apple customers and their employees is obvious and something I think Apple should be proud of. They definitely have a dedicated following. As does Harley-Davidson. So many people that ride these bikes also wear the clothes and of course have Harley tattoos. Apple and Harley should thank their fans for the free advertising!










Maybe these people should wise up and start charging!

Professional T-shirt Wearers

Check this guy out on iwearyourshirt.com.




His name is Jason Sadler and he is a "professional t-shirt wearer." He is also a creative entrepreneur. He started a business where companies pay him to wear t-shirts with their logo, website, etc.  He decided to wear a t-shirt everyday for a year and see how it worked. His idea has since blossomed into a pretty big deal. He has spoken at major universities and conferences all over the country. Jason and his fellow t-shirt wearer Evan, Facebook, tweet, and even make videos about the t-shirts they wear everyday. This way companies that pay them are not only getting the t-shirt wearing human billboard aspect but they are also getting social media advertising.

Cindy Perman from CNBC explains that "it seemed like a bold move to start a business during a recession but Sadler may have hit the market with his idea at a perfect time: Companies have been slashing their marketing budgets but at the same time, increasing their social media presence."

I wonder if being a professional t-shirt wearer would get old after a month or so...

FYI: iwearyourshirt.com is currently hiring! Go here for more information: http://iwearyourshirt.com/hiring

Insensitive or Inventive

Ladies and gentlemen, I give you..."Bumvertising."



These ideas for using people as advertising space sure keep getting more and more...creative! Bumvertising was invented by Benjamin Rogovy in order to advertise his website, Pokerfacebook.com. Since he first coined the term "bumvertising" it has created quite a stir! It has even been featured on the Daily Show.








So the question is, insensitive or inventive?

NASCAR


Is Nascar the professional version of driving around cars with ads? I think yes.








If Nascar can advertise like this then why shouldn't basketball players be able to wear a tattoo during games? I see no difference. Stephen M. McKelvey, a professor at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, brings up a good point in his article Commercial Branding: The Final Frontier or False Start for Athletes' Use of Temporary Tattoos as Body Billboards: "In auto racing and to a lesser extent individual-oriented sports such as tennis and gold, athletes adorned with commercial logos on their clothing and accessories have become commonplace. However, the major professional team-oriented leagues have historically restricted "on-field" commercialization of its players due not only to tradition, but also to the desire to protect their own-league wide business interests."

What do you all think? Should athletes be able to wear ads?